Methodologies for Evaluating IT Risks

Chosen theme: Methodologies for Evaluating IT Risks. Welcome to a practical, story-rich guide for leaders and practitioners who want clarity, confidence, and consistency when making technology risk decisions. Explore frameworks, adopt repeatable processes, and join our community to share insights and refine your craft.

Understanding the Landscape of IT Risk Evaluation

A startup we coached once tracked risks in a simple spreadsheet and labeled everything “High.” After an avoidable outage, they adopted a structured methodology, clarified tolerances, and prioritized actions. Tell us: how do you distinguish urgent threats from background noise in your environment?

Understanding the Landscape of IT Risk Evaluation

FAIR, NIST SP 800-30, ISO 27005, and OCTAVE each offer different lenses. FAIR quantifies loss, NIST guides process, ISO harmonizes governance, and OCTAVE prioritizes organizational context. Which lens aligns to your culture, data reality, and decision timelines?

Qualitative Approaches: Fast, Collaborative, Context-Rich

Facilitated workshops with architects, product owners, and incident responders reveal what dashboards miss. Use clear scales, time-box debates, and record assumptions. Invite your teams to share one lesson learned from a past incident to anchor ratings in reality.

Qualitative Approaches: Fast, Collaborative, Context-Rich

Heatmaps are useful but tricky. Define likelihood and impact rigorously, avoid mid-scale bias, and document thresholds. Revisit scores quarterly to reduce drift. Share your matrix template or subscribe for a deep dive on calibrating qualitative scales without losing nuance.

Quantitative Methods: From Probabilities to Dollars

FAIR breaks risk into loss event frequency and loss magnitude. By modeling contact frequency, threat capability, and control strength, teams produce defensible ranges. Have you tried FAIR for a high-stakes decision? Comment with your biggest calibration challenge.
Learn more

Hybrid Strategies: Bridging Qualitative Insight with Quantitative Rigor

Phase one: establish qualitative workshops and a living risk register. Phase two: pilot FAIR for two critical scenarios. Phase three: automate data feeds and simulation. Share your timeline, and we’ll feature a reader case study in our next edition.
Click here

Hybrid Strategies: Bridging Qualitative Insight with Quantitative Rigor

Map qualitative ratings to quantitative ranges carefully, preserving intent. Document your mapping logic and stress-test with past incidents. Invite stakeholders to challenge assumptions so your conversion keeps credibility across technology and finance teams.
From STRIDE to attack trees
Use STRIDE to discover threats, then expand with attack trees to map paths and controls. Linking scenarios to assets makes risk scoring concrete. Comment with a scenario you refined recently and how it changed a decision.
Business impact narratives
Translate technical failures into operational and financial stories: downtime, penalties, churn, and recovery costs. Walk leaders through day-one, week-one, and quarter-one consequences. Subscribers will receive our scenario storyboard template to strengthen executive conversations.
Common blind spots to address
Watch for third-party failures, misconfigured SaaS, stale access, and unmonitored data flows. Include recovery complexity and discovery latency in your impact estimates. Tell us which blind spot surprised you most during your last tabletop exercise.
CFOs want ranges, assumptions, and trade-offs. Engineers want control efficacy and backlog impact. Boards want trends and exposure to objectives. Share your favorite visualization for communicating risk without theatrics or ambiguity, and we’ll compile the best submissions.

Communicating Results and Driving Decisions

Contact us
Lemniscatelife
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.